CLF chimes in on Disaster Relief Funding
Fisheries Disaster Money Shows, but Where Should it Flow? – Here are some possible opportunities to get the best use out of New England’s disaster assistance: Read more here 12:02
Fisheries Disaster Money Shows, but Where Should it Flow? – Here are some possible opportunities to get the best use out of New England’s disaster assistance: Read more here 12:02
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
NILS STOLPE: The New England groundfish debacle (Part IV): Is cutting back harvest really the answer?
While it’s a fact that’s hardly ever acknowledged, the assumption in fisheries management is that if the population of a stock of fish isn’t at some arbitrary level, it’s because of too much fishing. Hence the term “overfished.” Hence the mandated knee jerk reaction of the fisheries managers to not enough fish; cut back on fishing. What of other factors? They don’t count. It’s all about fishing, because fishing is all that the managers can control; it’s their Maslow’s Hammer. When it comes to the oceans it seems as if it’s about all that the industry connected mega-foundations that support the anti-fishing ENGOs with hundreds of millions of dollars a year in “donations” are interested in controlling. Read the article here
I think that the amount of money that will be skimmed off the top for administrative cost, etc. should be addressed immediately and the primary stakeholders, ( Fishermen and related business that can prove a valid hardship) be given a loud voice in the distribution of any and all funding. We all know how this game is played with “grant grabbing and administrative scamsters” The initial 75 million will have some serious “shrinkage” if it is not kept until tight control.
Ed Everich