The cuts mean the key areas 4, 5, 6 and 7 will see volumes reduced by 17% or 17,959 metric tons, from last year’s 105,678t to 87,719t. Of this cut, roughly two-thirds or 12,000t will be felt by the inshore fishery, and one third or 6,000t will be mainly by the offshore fishery, including through indirect partnerships. undercurrent news Read more here 15:38
NILS STOLPE: The New England groundfish debacle (Part IV): Is cutting back harvest really the answer?
While it’s a fact that’s hardly ever acknowledged, the assumption in fisheries management is that if the population of a stock of fish isn’t at some arbitrary level, it’s because of too much fishing. Hence the term “overfished.” Hence the mandated knee jerk reaction of the fisheries managers to not enough fish; cut back on fishing. What of other factors? They don’t count. It’s all about fishing, because fishing is all that the managers can control; it’s their Maslow’s Hammer. When it comes to the oceans it seems as if it’s about all that the industry connected mega-foundations that support the anti-fishing ENGOs with hundreds of millions of dollars a year in “donations” are interested in controlling. Read the article here
Leave a Reply