Editorial: Fishery appeals ruling put onus on capping catch shares

Yet no one should believe that this ruling marks the end of the fight over catch shares, or other aspects of the gross mismanagment of New England’s and America’s fisheries by the administrator Jane Lubchenco and her National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, as we know it. For in standing by Amendment 16 and catch shares, Chief Judge Sandra Lynch — who wrote the decision or the court –  cited a December 2011 announcement by the regional fishery council that it is developing rules aimed at “reduc(ing) the likelihood that groundfish permit holders will acquire or control excessive shares or fishing privileges.”http://www.gloucestertimes.com/opinion/x520555400/Editorial-Fishery-appeals-ruling-put-onus-on-capping-catch-shares

One Response to Editorial: Fishery appeals ruling put onus on capping catch shares

  1. borehead says:

    While we can long argue over whether Zobel made the right decision,,,,,,,

    She didn't.

    ABOLISH CATCH SHARES NOW!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.