FISHERYNATION.COM

Act (“RFA”). In 1998 Judge Steven D. Merryday entered an order “upholding the quotas against attacks on the scientific method and theory underlying the quotas but rejecting NMFS’s putative analyses of the economic  effects  of  the  quotas  on  small  business.”  (Emphasis  mine)  Throughout  his  ruling  Judge Merryday was careful to point out the many and serious flaws in the Agency’s analysis of the consequences of its actions on the fishing public as well as the overzealous and contemptible behavior of NMFS. For example, he lambasted the Agency for not undertaking a legally required Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, choosing instead to put forward a Final RFA (FRFA) making sure the public would have no opportunity to weigh in on the draconian quota reductions put forward by the Agency. “NMFS chose an insular approach designed to block further investigation and public scrutiny.” Merryday wrote. Adding that, “NMFS compounded this error by preparing a FRFA that constitutes an attempt to agreeably decorate a stubborn conclusion.” He was not amused and made his feelings known in a scathing refutation of almost all of the Agency’s claims and actions during litigation. Willie R. Etheridge Seafood was one of the plaintiffs in this case, the fish house where Mark Cordeiro packed his sharks.

 

Merryday continued his appraisal of the Agency’s conduct in strongly worded language that not only scolded, but, moreover, let the Agency know that he was keenly aware of and well versed in the issues at hand.  “The  apparent  lapses  and  inconsistencies  in  NMFS’s  analyses  are  perhaps  attributable  to  the agency’s studied underestimation of the economic privations suffered by directed shark fishers at the hands of government regulators who lured them into dependence in the first instance.” (Emphasis added) The dirty little secret of the United States shark fishery is that it was, indeed, the federal government that “lured” industry into the fishery. After years of the industry establishing businesses and infrastructure to deal with the relatively new fishery, the United States Government, at the bequest of various Non-Governmental Organizations pulled the rug out from under it resulting in severe economic hardships and the resultant cases cited here. But it got even worse, and Judge Merryday expressed outrage at the Agency’s continued conduct in this matter.

 

Merryday’s decision left in place the 1997 quotas while the analyses of the economic impacts were to be completed. His February 1998 orders to the Agency were unequivocal and clear; “the status quo should persist…” In June of 1999 NMFS issued an order further reducing quotas in direct violation of Judge Merryday’s order. Judge Merryday had enough. He wrote, “NMFS is an agency willing to pursue its institutional objectives without acknowledging applicable Congressional and judicial limitations.” Something industry has known for a long time. And then he got to the heart of the matter, declaring, “Allowing  a  government  agency  to  circumvent  the  judicial  process  by  permitting  the  agency  to promulgate intervening and incongruous regulations emasculates and disarms completely the remedial mechanism intended by Congress to detect, correct, and prevent reckless and unlawful rule-making. At some point the judicial process must catch up to the regulatory process.” He stopped just short of a contempt charge. The anger of the Agency would lie dormant for years, waiting for an opportunity to resurrect and find a way to punish those it blamed for its embarrassing treatment at the hands of a federal district court judge. Who better than those who financed the lawsuits?

 

Several members of the directed shark fishery industry, who had either been plaintiffs in the 1997 case or helped fund it, have been purposefully driven out of the business by the federal government and its agents working in consort. Some had businesses shut down and were thrown into prison, some were given exorbitant fines in excess of several million dollars for baseless charges, and others, like Etheridge and Cordeiro left the industry after permit sanctions and the fear of additional reprisals and prosecutions made continuing in the directed shark industry impossible. Lest anyone think the industry is overreacting, the 2009 Inspector General Report details the “systemic” abuses of the industry at the hands of NOAA Enforcement.  Commenting on the Report, Senator Olympia Snowe from Maine stated “I am appalled at the stunning breadth and depth of the Inspector General’s findings of gross mismanagement within all levels of NOAA’s law enforcement community.” Remember Judge Merryday’s assessment of NMFS,
calling it an “agency willing to pursue its institutional objectives without acknowledging applicable Congressional and judicial limitations.” Breaking the law was never a problem either. But back to the Etheridge/Cordeiro case.

 

For years fishermen and industry leaders had been telling NMFS that its rule prohibiting a shark fin-to carcass ratio in excess of 5% was arbitrary and not based on real life experience in the fishery. Dewey Hemilright,  (a  member  of  the  Mid-Atlantic  Fisheries  Management  Council,  and  a  2012  National Fisherman Highliner of the Year), who participated in the shark fishery understood the presumption that needed rebutting. Soon after the initial Etheridge/Cordeiro hearing Hemilright, with the aid of members of the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, undertook an experiment to show that it is not only reasonable to be over 5%, but also, probable, when fishing practices utilized by most shark fishermen are taken into account; practices such as keeping eight fins instead of four, leaving excess meat on the fins, and carving waste material from shark carcasses. Although not an “official” scientific undertaking the experiment showed beyond any doubt that shark fishing practices in North Carolina produced a product that was consistently over the 5% limit. Further, this fact was underscored by law enforcement when, as was testified to at the Etheridge/Cordeiro hearing before McKenna, they had been telling fishermen for years that as long as they had fins and corresponding carcasses percentages did not matter. This is a crucial part of the story because even Judge McKenna stated, “without the benefit of the statutory presumption, the Agency’s case would not stand.” But he allowed it to stand despite his own correct interpretation of the statute by creating an entirely different standard to judge Etheridge and Cordeiro.

 

The problem for NMFS is that it has become the amen corner for radical environmentalism and because the shark is one of the poster children for so-called conservation, the Agency’s “institutional objectives” changed from promoting a healthy, American fishery to regulating commercial fishermen out of the business without regard to due process or the rule of law. The ALJs, in this case Judge McKenna, actually advocated for the Agency by helping it piece together an outcome in search of a legal theory. As both the 1997 case and the recent district court case show, NMFS is not averse to changing the rules whenever it feels it is being beaten by them. For example, in the Etheridge/Cordeiro case NMFS changed the charges against the men several times finally settling on an interpretation of the law that was fatally flawed. In their minds a rebuttable presumption equaled guilt with absolutely no room for discussion, and, right on cue, Judge McKenna agreed.

 

The statutory requirement (carefully worded and written by Congress) allowed the shark finning presumption to be rebutted by “reliable, credible, and probative evidence” which Etheridge and Cordeiro were able to do rather easily using, amongst other things, the Hemilright data and experiments. With no thought of irony crossing his mind ALJ McKenna then created an “Alternative Violation Threshold” (AVT) above the 5%, in effect agreeing with Etheridge and Cordeiro that they had good (credible) evidence and reasons for being above 5%. Remarkably, however, he then held the men accountable for a new, higher threshold having all but admitted the 5% level was successfully rebutted. McKenna found his theory justifying his earlier guilty verdict. Interestingly, he also reduced the fines levied in his original decision from 18 charges at ten thousand dollars per charge ($180,000), to 13 charges at $1,500 per charge ($19,500). In doing so, McKenna, perhaps unwittingly, underscored the successful rebuttal of the 5% rule in at least five of the charges; making his “Alternative Violation Threshold” theory a dangling piñata waiting for the stick of a more serious judicial review to smash it to pieces. Enter Judge Boyle.

 

But, an “alternative” threshold means the old one (5%)  could not hold up under evidence and the testimony of Etheridge and his colleagues; this was a major reason federal district court Judge Boyle threw cold water on the Agency’s and Judge McKenna’s “arbitrary and capricious” analysis of the statute and ruled for Etheridge and Cordeiro. Both he, and Judge Merryday in the 1997 case, were keenly aware of the Agency’s shenanigans during adjudication and ruled appropriately. Their decisions in these cases should provide ample precedent and legal cover for serious reform at NMFS and with the Administrative Law Courts. Unfortunately, the United States Congress has not addressed, in any meaningful fashion, either the glaring problems with NMFS highlighted in the two lawsuits discussed here, or the systemic problems cited in the Inspector General’s Report of 2009. In many ways the problems have gotten worse.

 

In his book “Terms of Engagement” attorney Clark M. Neily III refers to problems with certain type cases, stating, “Judges are required to help the government win rational basis cases [which ALJ cases are at root] by abandoning judicial neutrality and serving as courtroom advocates for one party in a legal dispute. This would be an outrage in any other setting, and a clear violation of judicial ethics. But in Rational Basis Land [or ALJ Land], it’s just another day at the courthouse.” ALJ McKenna gave the Agency another bite at the apple by moving the goal posts after their finning accusations were wholly rebutted. Fixing this institutional type problem would go a long way towards making sure prosecutions could pass legal muster on the merits of the case, not because the adjudicating process was a slam dunk for the government.

 

In the end, the verdict in Etheridge/Cordeiro v. U.S Department of Commerce, et al. is a good one, albeit enormously costly in both treasure and time. It may even serve as some sort of model for persistence by men who had had enough of what Judge Merryday called NMFS’s contempt for the judicial process. In plain fact, however, it was Mr. Etheridge’s obstinate refusal to admit guilt when neither he nor Mr. Cordeiro had violated the law, his belief that a “real” judge would rule in his favor, and his ability to finance an almost eight year court battle that is the story. Commenting on this story, Etheridge noted how frustrating and extremely aggravating it is to recall all of this; to see what he and his business and family have gone through at the hands of his own government, and then to realize his elected officials have done precious little, if anything, to see that changes come to this terrible system and fisheries management.

 

Wikipedia defines a Pyrrhic victory as a victory with such a devastating cost that it is tantamount to defeat. Someone who wins a Pyrrhic victory has been victorious in some way; however, the heavy toll negates any sense of achievement or profit. Etheridge, in his pursuit of justice, has done a noble and honorable thing for an industry he loves and that has been very good to him; he has held its managers liable. Hopefully, his effort will achieve more far reaching objectives in terms of substantive change in fisheries management and political accountability, and allow his retirement years a well-deserved sense of personal and professional achievement.

 

Sadly, most Americans and, certainly, most fishermen, cannot afford a long protracted fight against the national government, even when they know they are innocent.  The government banks on that fact. Perhaps  in  this  case  the  “judicial  process  [did]  catch  up  to  the  regulatory  process”  to  paraphrase Merryday, but until and unless the legislative process catches up to the regulatory process, and Congress exercises its authority,  the out of control agencies in our country will continue to run roughshod over the citizens of our ever-vanishing Republic.

 

**Sean   McKeon   was   the   president   of   the   North   Carolina   Fisheries   Association   during   the

Etheridge/Cordeiro hearings and appeals.**

 

SOUTHERN  OFFSHORE  FISHING  ASS’N  v.  DALEY,  55  F.Supp.2d  1336  (1999),  United  States

District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division., June 30, 1999.

—————————————————————————————————

After listening to the guidelines lay ed out at the SALTONSTAL​L-KENNEDY TELEPHONE TOWNHALL AND WEBINAR Thursday, August 8 from 3:00 to 5:00 pm that lasted all of thirty seven minutes, tieing up both my computer, AND my telephone, because some government employee wasn’t capable of presenting a webinar with a listen only setup, with a call in number for questions that could have been heard through the webinar, I realize what a sham this latest attempt was to help the government destroyed industry this is.

I saw the attendees list, and I recognized not one single name involved in the Northeast Multi Specie Groundfish industry, and as far as I know, it’s the Northeast Multi Specie Groundfish industry that was declared a failed fishery by the US Commerce Department.

 

Senator Warren was all gung ho about fishery aid to the Northeast ground fishery.

For the past two years, I have made many visits to Massachusetts fishing communities in New Bedford, Gloucester and the South Shore to hear about the challenges facing the industry. I’ve listened to boat owners and fishermen who face devastating catch allocation cuts, and I’ve spoken with net makers and icemen whose businesses depend on a strong fishing fleet to make ends meet. The message I’ve heard has been clear: The federal government needs to act quickly to provide disaster assistance for our fishermen, and we need long-term policy changes and better science to preserve this critical lifeline that has been part of the commonwealth’s economy and traditions for generations.

It is vitally important we support our fishermen in these difficult times, and I’m committed to being a strong advocate in Washington for Massachusetts’ fishing communities.

Senator Warren, if there is one shred of truth to your “commitment”, then I suggest to you, you make sure that these insignificant monies, in relationship to the scope of this government caused disaster which has become even more critical because of environmental issues that at the time of the disaster declaration were not known, go where they will do the most good for those you mentioned in the above quote.

Boat owners, fishermen, net makers, icemen, fuel men, machine shop’s, welders, railway’s vessel supplier’s, electronic shop’s, are the ones that need this measly $10 million dollars, which is a drop in the bucket that NOAA owes the fishing industry in S-K money.

Babbling John Bullard, a man that is not quite sure what his official title is, believes his agency of shame is bending over backwards to present “opportunity” for the beleaguered fleet is excited about dogfish as an important ingredient in the salvation plan, but today on Cape Cod, dogfish was 10 cents a pound to the boat.

That’s $10 dollars a box, 10 boxes, a thousand pounds is $100 dollars.

That does not even come close to paying the fuel bill that comes out of the crews share. How can the crewman pay his rent? buy groceries?

How can he buy gloves at NB Ship Supply?

How can the owner haul his boat out at the railway, when the pathetic, paltry $10 million S-K money that should be going to the industry is being divided into grant money through a competition for entities which are not directly fleet involved?

It is another slap in the face of those thrusted into the cruelty of administrative failure.

Is this how you help those you said needed help?

Captain Paul Cohan of Gloucester wrote a response to your op-ed posted at the Gloucester Daily Times, and Southcoast Today.

In it he wrote,

Do you realize who are going to be the beneficiaries of these “sustenance crumbs” which have fallen under NOAA’s banquet table will be?

The consultants, the grant writers, the lawyers who represent the consultants and grant writers, basically, the chiselers.

Senator, is this what you had in mind?

To get the best use of this money for those that need it the most, the money should be used as a fuel subsidy to those that are responsible to provide the raw material that drives this industry, the fishermen.

This fuel subsidy should be granted to the smallest industry members, the single and two vessel operation’s in the Common Pool and Sectors.

It’s the fishermen that need the help so they can keep everyone else going, and a fuel subsidy will bring them some relief.

Now. Let’s look ahead at the “Big Picture” in the next Go ‘Round, and Bust Up the Big Boy’s with a Buy Out.

Comment here

 

A Pathetic Joke Reaffirm’s that some Politicians are Clueless

 

 

 

 July 24, 2013 – John Aldridge, a crewmember of the 44-foot lobster vessel Anna Mary was last seen aboard the boat during his watch relief at 9 p.m., Tuesday, while the vessel was underway off Montauk, N.Y.

How many times have you read of or heard of a fisherman going overboard, only to watch an unsuccessful chain of events involving fruitless search and rescue operation’s to see them become possible recovery operation’s, and predictably, abandoned after a period of time, dictated by estimates of rate of survival and sea conditions?

Way too many.

Have you known anyone that has been lost? John Aldridge is not your typical fisherman that would find himself in an environment that, under those circumstances, would have mortal man in full blown panic mode, watching that 360 light disappear over the horizon, enveloped in darkness, feeling that cold water biting at every square inch of skin.

He had some things going for him, like the boot’s he used to keep himself afloat, and one thing we all think we have, self confidence. His attitude was his saving grace, along with the ability to improvise under extreme pressure, fighting to live, and when they found him twelve hours later, alive, we all know it was nothing short of a miracle.

The whole nation knows of John Aldridge because of his unusual survival story.

We all know how rare this is in the fishing industry.

Honestly, had that been me, I wouldn’t have made it. Think about your self for a few minutes, and assess your reality of the chances of coming through this as Aldridge did.Be honest. Would you have made it?

Contemplate the reactions of your wife, children, sister, mother, father, all your friends, dory mates knowing you’ve been swallowed by the sea.Hell. Think about your favorite bartender holding your tab till you settle up!

These incidents will never be eliminated, but there is some cheap insurance that can be purchased to stack the odds of survival and/or recovery in your favor, and one item in particular would increase the ability to be found.

The first is a PFD.Getting you guy’s to wear one will be scorned by many of you, but with the many styles, including co2 inflated, there is a huge selection available to choose from, and would at least make your chance’s of survival 100% better with than without.The second item is the Personal Locator Beacon. Same thing as the PFD’s.

Huge range of selection and they all do the same thing. Tell the people looking for you where you are.

If Aldridge had one of these, they would have found him within a couple of hours, depending on how quick the Coast Guard could’ve gotten there, or even sooner by commercial vessels alerted by the Coast Guard.As I said, think about your wife, children, sister, mother, father, all your friends, dory mates, and your bartender!Get and use a PFD, and be sure it has a PLB in the pocket.

Comment here

 

——————————————————————————Richard Gaines, Staff Writer, Gloucester Daily TimesFor years, we found his byline under the headline of every major fishery article that we read at the Gloucester Daily Times.It told us to read on for the truth and an unbiased perspective that a great journalist presents regarding our livelihoods.

Richard’s articles provided the information to the public of the complexities that made up the convoluted issues surrounding the stories of the New England ground fishery — something that was just about impossible.Some of the articles would leave the public confused, but industry insiders knew exactly what he was bringing up.  At times, these controversial to insider articles would erupt, causing some noses to get out of joint, generating lively, pointed, and sometimes fierce debate.

Those were my favorites, and I know what Richard wrote was on the money, even though some would disagree, of course.

To those people I say, some of these issues will be raised again, because there has been no closure.

There’s a lot of unfinished business to be settled, and our literary warrior, Richard Gaines, forever rides with many of us in our hearts and minds. Many of us that will attempt to keep those issues alive.

There are some that won’t share in our feelings regarding our beloved friend and beacon of justice for the small boat fishermen, and for fishermen in general, and we understand this.ENGO’s and the “too big to fail” fishing conglomerates and even the bureaucracy of NOAA/NMFS, that includes OLE/OGC, may be breathing sighs of relief, or are even content to know that Richard Gaines won’t be watchdogging them.

While such agenda bound groups might find temporary relief in Richard’s passing, his crossing the bar merely reaffirms to us that we must each continue the struggles that are easier to walk away from than to stand and fight back.  To those bad players, we’ll steadfastly say, “As long as we draw a breath of existence, let it be known that our loss will not be your gain.”

I also realize that many who do understand what I’m trying to say are battle weary. For many, it’s been a decade’s long continuous fight, but it is a worthy one.

Richard Gaines created a standard that we all now expect in the esoteric arena of fishery journalism; but sadly, there is no one individual to carry on the legacy he left for us.  During this time of awakening to this cruel reality the question becomes, “How do we continue Richard’s work that still demands greater accountability to the resource and the public?”

We must find the way. Richard would want us to; and his bright beacon will forever guide us to that home harbor where truth and conscience tie up to the dock alongside integrity and grit.

Click to comment

—————————————————————————————————————-

When you lose something you can’t replace

South Coast Today reporter Steve Urbon did an article about Richard Gaines crossing the bar,”Reporter’s death silences voice for fishing industry” and the void that has become apparent to all of us that follow these issues.

It was a decent response to the fact that Richard Gaines was absolutely superior at his craft, and that we have lost the important ingredient of the compound of the glue that has held us together.

Richard was a gift to us all, not only from himself, but from his Editor, Ray Lamont, who enabled Richard to indulge deeply into the issues that would not have been known.

We owe the Gloucester Daily Times, and Ray in particular, a great deal of gratitude.

I have a running inventory the articles generated from the home team, and since February, 2010 , there are hundreds and hundreds of articles dedicated to Gloucester and New England fish reporting. Richard and the Times were all inclusive for all of New England with their coverage.

I also posted as many South Coast Today articles as I could, but being not as dedicated to the cause as the Gloucester Daily Times, there are but a fraction of the articles. For instance in March of 2010, Gaines published fifteen articles, Urbon published one.

There were also four Editorials published at the Gloucester Daily Times.

Not to mention, they have a pay wall after ten articles, leaving a void in available material for people that can’t afford to pay, but want to read the information.

Interesting enough, they also have articles that are not “keyed” allowing free access.

When it comes to information about the industry, and a publication is interested in getting the specific information to the people in the industry, the industry information should fall into that category. Not keyed.

Fishing industry news is not a money maker like a horrific crime, or a Nascar wreck, but sometimes some things are about more than money.

To exclude interested party’s from this information in the name of profit does nothing for the industry that has people in this day and age landing brokers, or losing everything they own.

Jim Kendall was quoted in the article.

“No one got into it like Richard,” said seafood consultant Jim Kendall. “It even got to the point where fishermen were (angry) at him for knowing too much about the fishing industry. He was like a brother or a cousin. You know the good and the bad. That didn’t bother him one bit.” He’s right,

The door is still open on a lot of the issues that the Times, and Gaines fearlessly published, much to the chagrin of some in the industry.

The ones that were angry were angry for real reasons, and for every angry fisherman, there were dozens that were grateful that the crap that would be preferred to be ignored instead, was being discussed in the “Front of the House”

The last sentence in Urbons article. “There is going to be a lot for the rest of us to do.”

A more accurate statement could not have been written.

The question is, who is going to do it, and can we count on getting the whole story like we have been getting?

“Lights will guide you home, and ignite your bones,,,,”

Comment here

Walmart will continue to sell Alaska Salmon that is not MSC certified, but not in the US!

Dear salmon supplier,

As you know, Walmart has an ongoing commitment to sustainable seafood sourcing. To meet our requirements for wild-caught seafood, the source fishery must be certified sustainable to the MSC standard (or equivalent*) or, if not certified, actively working toward certification. This latter scenario includes fisheries in public fishery improvement projects (FIPs).

Sources of MSC certified fisheries are currently available from Alaska, British Columbia, and Russia. If you are not already sourcing from an MSC certified fishery, please explore these options. Since these areas also have fisheries that are not MSC certified, it is critical you buy from companies or producers with MSC chain of custody.

Currently, there is only one public salmon FIP in the world. It is a very small project led by WWF for chum salmon in the Tugur River of Russia. However, we are aware there are discussions of other FIPs in Russia and Alaska. In order to meet Walmart’s requirements these FIPs must be made public and must have a comprehensive work plan available showing how it is working toward certification. If you would like to sell Walmart product that is from a fishery in a FIP, please work with the organization implementing the FIP to meet the requirements above before shipping any product to us. If you have questions about this or need advice, please contact me via email and copy Brad Spear([email protected])with Sustainable Fisheries Partnership, our NGO partner.

 

Although I’m not a Salmon Supplier, I am an American Citizen reading about Walmart dumping the Alaska Salmon Fishery as a supplier of Salmon at Walmart stores in the United States for the lack of some little blue ENGO sticker from Britain!

Walmart Corporation ignores the fact that all US fisheries are fished sustainably BY LAW.

The Walton Foundation has a history of financing destructive policies towards US Fishermen through collaboration with ENGO’s that are anti US Fisherman.

Once again, they remind me they are no friend of our Fishermen.

I remind you that the Walton Foundation financed the Pew/EDF/ENGO written “Oceans of Abundance” hogwash that has turned many politicians against US Fishermen, while financing the Corporate green washers they need to paint them as eco friendly.

I had to see who the MSC funders, backers, “partners” are, and amazingly, the Walton Foundation is among those that support the profit generating Marine Stewardship Council, along with an all star cast of “Ocean Champions”! Link

I’m curious about this, though.

It seems as though Walmart won’t stop selling Alaska Salmon.

They just won’t be selling it to US citizens!

Alaskan seafood now being imported directly

Alaskan seafood has begun being imported directly into Brazil this month via supplier Noronha Pescados. The products are Alaska salmon, pollock and cod and they are going straight to Walmart, Pao de Acucar, Cencosud and other Brazilian stores.

Michael Cerne, the executive director of the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute (ASMI), attributed the quick and relatively recent growth of Brazil’s interest in Alaskan seafood to ASMI’s marketing initiatives.

“The Brazilian programme for ASMI is relatively new. We just started about a year and a half ago,” said ASMI’s Brazilian marketer Jose Madeira, KMXT reports. “We’re like a beef country, but per capita consumption of seafood in Brazil has like doubled in the last decade.”

Until now, Brazil had only been exposed to Alaskan cod, but it was shipped through Portugal, where it was salted. Because of that midway point, Cerne explained that the fish could no longer be labelled “Alaskan” as there was a lack of traceability. 

But directly shipping the fish to Brazil does allow for the fish to be labelled as Alaskan, which paves the way for other Alaskan fish, Madeira stated.

“So we’re also exploring other opportunities with other species like salmon, halibut, black cod and some other species,” he said. “So we see great potential for Brazil; it’s a relatively new market, and we’re just starting to see the numbers moving up.”

Based on the price point, the target market will probably be middle class and upper middle class, according to Dru Fenster, a spokesperson for ASMI, The Cordova Times reports.

Madeira has been in charge of much of the marketing and promotion behind the scenes, which, as Cerne pointed out, is responsible for growth in the markets.

“We do a lot of promotion efforts with our partners in Brazil supporting the importers,” he said. “We do retail merchandizing, we have a very extensive programme for advertising, trade missions, participate in trade shows. We just organized a buyer delegation from Brazil to come to Alaska in July.”

He acknowledged that Alaska wild salmon is up against the very popular farmed Atlantic salmon in Brazil, although ASMI sees a lot of potential in the food service industry.

“We have a strong message about salmon, and I think eventually we’re going to break into the Brazilian market and get some very good market share,” he added.

ASMI has been working within Brazil since 2011 and conducted two trade missions there in March and December 2012. Its figures show that imports from Alaska doubled last year and Cerne expects the trend to keep progressing.

By Natalia Real  http://www.fis.com/fis/worldnews/worldnews.asp?monthyear=7-2013&day=1&id=61852&l=e&country=0&special=&ndb=1&df=0  

They would deny US Walmart shoppers access to Alaska Salmon, but back door it to Brazil!

ASMI responds to Walmart letter on salmon; surprised Walmart would reject American fish

Comment here

——————————————————————————————————–

I was wondering,,,,,,,,,,,

It’s the weekend, and I’m wondering if the people that are interested enough in fishery related news and issues are taking the weekend off, like it’s only a Monday through Friday activity?

I’m wondering if the people that read about these issues, and pay to access pay sites, feel like they are getting their moneys worth, when Fisherynation.com gives them the same information or more without the foodie stuff, seven days per week, and post it as it arrives?

I wonder if John Sackton really expects anyone in the New England fishing industry to give legitimacy to his description of the hookers, who are having an identity crisis, like NMFS is with this NOAA Fisheries thing?

Finally, the Cape Cod Hookers are changing their name to the Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen’s Alliance, as more types of fishermen join the organization than just long liners.  No word yet on a name change for their annual ‘Hookers Ball’ which is a big fundraiser for them on Cape Cod.  The group was criticized in New England for its close association with environmental NGO’s during deliberations on catch shares, after it’s pilot program on cod shares became highly valuable and successful.

After all, you can put lipstick on the pig, but it’s still a pig, right?

I just finished reading Peter Shelley’s whine fest about the state of New England cod and the apologists for overfishing, and wonder if he realizes the ones that are over fishing the most are never include in the discussion?

I wonder if he just brushes aside the building wave of articles concerning the unregulated fishing community of Marine Mammals of all types that have blossomed following forty one years of protection, pretending not to see them?

Wondering if ‘ole Peter raises a garden, and if he does, do you think he’d just let the varmints just eat the vegetables he might be trying to grow because he would never put a fence around them to protect the vegetables?

I wonder if he has bird feeders around his property, and allows the pesky squirrels to empty them out, denying the birds feed?

I’m wondering what the anti shark fin bunch in Cali is thinking when they deprive cultural consumers of shark fin soup, turning the Asian community into pariahs, while expecting the fins from legally landed sustainable shark fisheries, to be wasted and not utilized?

Do enviro groups, like Oceana, the Center for Biological Diversity, Shark Stewards, and WildEarth Guardians discount the science of NOAA/NMFS unless it comes to using the questionable science to cleanse the ocean of fishermen?

Does it not seem as though this is what hypocrite Peter Shelley accuses the “industry apologists” of?

(Isn’t it interesting, by the way, how the same industry apologists who are so quick to savage the federal stock assessment science when it doesn’t say what they want to hear are so quick to rely on it when it does?) Peter Shelley

 In its decision, the National Marine Fisheries Service discounted the first peer-reviewed scientifically published population estimate of West Coast great white sharks which unveiled what listing proponents said are alarmingly low numbers of breeding females — numbers drastically lower than those of most other endangered species.

“The federal government simply made the wrong decision in the face of the best available science,” Geoff Shester, California Program Director for Oceana

I’m wondering when commercial fishermen will realize the benefit of utilizing Personal Flotation Devices as a cheap insurance policy following the death of another fisherman, Abbotsford fisherman Albert Arthur Armstrong in Prince Rupert ,BC.?

Not knowing the full extent of the situation, other than he was tangled up in a gill net, could it have made the difference?

After all, Commercial fishing is still the most dangerous occupation in the world, is it not?

I’m wondering why the most destructive corporation of Main Street America, Walmart, is willing to stop stocking wild caught Alaska Salmon just because another parasitic of the purest form ENGO, MSC, no longer carry’s the logo, but is lawfully obliged to fish as a sustainable fishery?

The bulk of Alaska’s salmon industry, you’ll recall, recently fired MSC — the London-based Marine Stewardship Council — as tedious, expensive and superfluous. DB

I’m wondering if you’ll join me as I reach out to the Norigs3 Coalition to oppose oil and gas drilling on any part of Georges Bank?

If you can answer these questions, or have some of your own, leave a comment or a question, will ya? BH

http://www.talkingfish.org/opinion/worst-times-or-just-very-very-bad-industry-splits-hairs-over-the-awful-condition-of-cod?

http://www.lakeconews.com:federal-government-wont-give-california-great-white-sharks-endangered-species-status

http://www.thevindicator.com most dangerous job

http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/213558841.html

http://deckboss.blogspot.com/2013/06/is-this-anything.html

http://www.thevanguard.ca/Business/2013-06-27/article-3293474/Norigs-3-wants-action-on-Georges-Bank-moratorium/1

Comment here

 

Let’s be fair John Bullard, You’re the Master of Folksy Feel Good Babble

John Bullard, NE Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, which is his official title, began his comments at the NEFMC meeting this Tuesday morning recalling his interactions with Richard Gaines, Staff Reporter, Gloucester Daily Times

The recollections of Bullard of a relentless technician of journalistic excellence were interesting, and are telling of the new revisionist history era that we are entering.

Always the Master of Folksy Feel Good Babble, Bullard recalled meeting the Gloucester Daily Times reporter when he landed job the running Northeast Regional Office, for an informal harbor side chat, and telephone conversations that would at times be long winded, as I’m sure Richard would give this guy the third degree, ripping and gouging to get as much information as he could get.

John Bullard’s recollections were shared in a humorous, folksy friendly way.

Something Bullard said, though, was interesting, and it was about Gaines and that he wasn’t fair, but was an industry partisan, which is accurate. He was industry partisan for a reason, and for anyone connected to NMFS administration to complain about fairness, is ludicrous.

“Was Gaines fair? Hell no he wasn’t fair” said Bullard.

Gaines exposed just how unfair the history of this agency is to fishermen from the yellowtail letter, to the pilfering of the Asset Forfeiture Fund for exotic, and other questionable travel by a bunch of government servants that operated as they answered to no one, because they didn’t.

Larry Yacubian, the disgraced former scalloper from New Bedford that lost everything he ever worked for because the NMFS OLE and OGC could tell you how fair they were, and the ALJ helped them prove it!

The notes and emails to Swartwood coordinating the meeting reflect the active involvement of Cam Kerry, chief counsel for the Commerce Department, and his deputy Geovette Washington, as well as Monica Medina, NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco’s principal deputy. Their initiative was aimed at clearing the reputation of the Coast Guard judges via the secret meeting.

Although fragmentary, the notes obtained by the Times describe an impassioned effort by Joseph Ingolia, then chief justice of the U.S. Coast Guard Administrative Law Judge System,to resurrect the reputation of the system that suffered severe damage in Swartwood’s 236-page report last April examining four dozen cases referred to him by Zinser.

By the date of the hour-long meeting in Swartwood’s Boston office on Nov. 15, Ingolia, who has since retired, had negotiated a NOAA press release exonerating the system in exchange for its agreement to complete cases docketed prior to Sept. 8, 2011.

The press release of Nov. 10, five days before the meeting, was shown to Swartwood, while, according to the notes, Ingolia and Megan Allison, the court system administrator, emphasized that the chain of command at the Commerce Department and its subordinate agency NOAA had agreed it would be best for Swartwood to retract his allegations.

“I don’t think that anybody has to be damaged by this,” Ingolia is reported to have said. “You took testimony about facts, you carried out your duties with respect to what you were asked to do — used testimony — that testimony is wrong — you can come out with something, re-evaluate with new information, and with the respect to Coast Guard ALJ (administrative law judges), you say what you want by way of correction — if that happens, it aligns everything …. “

From Crooked Cops, to Catch Shares and Camelot, the “best available science” of questionable stock surveys based on admitted purposeful negligence to utilize the trawl gear as designed for use on the Good Ship Big and Slow, there is nothing fair about John Bullard’s agency, or trustworthy.

What he did not say is also noteworthy.

The fact is, that much to the horror of every NOAA/NMFS bureaucrat is that got their noses stuffed into the poop pile, Gaines was brutally honest, and that has absolutely nothing to do with fairness.

It has everything to do with courage.

John Bullard’s agency can’t even be honest about who they are, and this is also recognized on the West Coast as there is no such agency titled NOAA Fisheries. John is not the Administrator of that non existent agency.

John Bullard, NE Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service

Link to quote

Comment here

—————————————————————————————————————–

One scandal of the National Marine Fishery Service, unknown, but for Richard Gaines

Some that read this, will know of Richard Gaines. Some may recognize his name from the hundreds of articles seeded from Gloucester Daily Times (gloucestertimes.com) to this newsvine community of ours, as well as other outlets of fishery news.  The name is recognized in every circle of this industry from Maine to Alaska, and internationally in the fishing world as well. Fishing people  know who he is and they are glad to know him, or of him. He has been chronicling the current chapter of  fishery history, that will be cited in fishing history books to be written in the future, using the news archives of the Gloucester Daily Times as many authors have before.  Richard Gaines is continuing the tradition, as the Times has recorded fishing history since 1888.

There are hundreds of books and publications that site the Times in reference for the subject matter of the fishery that has been the back bone of Gloucester. This famous and historic seaport which is the home of commerce in the new world is this place. Europeans came here to fish. Gloucester is fish!

The recent admittance of two very powerful government agency’s that NOAAs National Marine Fishery Service was exposed by the US Commerce Departments Inspector General Todd Zinnser forced the apology. While using and abusing their authority in a very unprofessional manner and shown to be extreme while performing their duties, and down right lying and covering up their activity, someone has had to answer for this mess. In many opinions these abuses are no less than criminal.

Director Jane Lubchenco, had slid her hand along a spoke of the wheel, to steer her ship, NOAA, and picked up a splinter. That splinter consisted of many years of abuse and was later found to have a source of unlimited party money from a bottomless pit. The Asset Forfeiture Fund. A fund that was compiled of fines generated in the enforcement of the nations fishery laws. The splinter has caused an infection. Her agenda to drive the fisheries of the nation to the commodity market, is has inflamed many, to include growing members of the US Congress. There will be plenty to answer for.

If you were employed in the process of enforcing these laws, you were a direct benefactor as these funds went largely unchecked and were found, through the IG investigation, to have been abused. Performance bonuses were awarded regularly from the fund. Abused were the people who generate the raw product in the fishing community to turn into a tangible product that fuels the commerce of the community. In effect, these Federal employees removed millions of dollars from the community. In a four and one half-year period, they removed $100 million dollars from the community. With the economic multiplier of x6, that’s a lot of money removed from the community, not just from fishermen, but from the local economy. I would dare say that more than a few teachers salary’s would have been afforded.

To be fair infractions were committed, but, through the investigation, many of these fines were found to be generated by confusion of the misunderstanding of these laws. A complicated tangle of regulations that require a law degree to understand, and even then, it’s a good possibility a barrister could also misunderstand.

But Jane’s splinter went in very deep, and she thought she could ignore it and move forward without addressing the issue of her law enforcement branch. She was denied.  And she, at the end of this chapter was forced to do something that I’m sure made her ill. Apologise to fishermen that were abused by her NMFS agency. Her boss Gary Locke also apologised. He missed the chance to make right for his mishandling of other overlooked debacles related directly to his decision-making.

From this vantage point, they also owe the community of Gloucester an apology, as well as the other outposts of New England’s ground fish fleet. They have a few more apology’s to go. And the compensation returned is far from satisfactory.

There has been one constant that fishermen have been able to count on through this episode of history that they have lived through that will be written about, just as  fishermen before them have from this historic place.

Who in the Hell is Richard Gaines?     Richard Gaines, Staff Writer, Gloucester Daily Times.

I can guarantee, that the members of the New England Fishery Management Council know him. Everyone at NMFS surely know of him. I know Dr. Jane Lubchenco of EDF/NOAA fame knows who Richard Gaines is! Hell! even US Commerce Secretary Gary Locke knows who he is. I’d bet even President Obama  knows of him.

These are some  that wished they hadn’t.

I would dare say that for the last two years, or so, thanks to Richard we should all be very grateful to know of him, for if it not for Richards determination to bring this information to the public, there is a real chance that things would be the same as they were. Disgustingly dysfunctional. This journalist has single-handedly brought these fishery issues to the attention of the citizens of the United States, and the world!

There has been a noticeable lack of media coverage of the major networks, and print media, but thankfully for the sake of justice for all, the determined Richard Gaines, with his editors support, Ray Lamond, the misdeeds and injustices of two very powerful government agency’s, NOAA/NMFS, and US COMMERCE have been exposed.

With special thanks to Joey C, creator of GoodMorningGloucester who did an interview with this humble gentleman on a dock in Gloucester Harbor, we all get a chance to know Richard a little better, and to understand why he stayed focused. It’s in him.

Although I doubt he would agree, We all owe Richard Gaines our Gratitude. He brought us all Justice.

Richard Gaines– The Interview Part I | GoodMorningGloucester   Jun 7, 2009

 

Richard Gaines– The Interview Part II | GoodMorningGloucester  Jun 7, 2009

—————————————————————————————————————————-

Lookin’ Back: Capt Dave and F/V Hard Merchandise to make television debut!

(originally published @newsvine.com

Tue Feb 7, 2012 5:33 AM

I had heard the rumors. There was to be a new series about fishing, along the lines of Deadliest Catch, and Lobster Wars, and others like it. It appears that the tv viewing public really enjoy these types of shows.

There have been some interesting fishery issues concerning the New England ground fishery, and I decided to contact Gloucester Fisherman Captain Dave Marciano, and discuss our shared concerns.

During the conversation, I asked him what he had been up to.

He mentioned that he had been busy filming with National Geographic Channel’s upcoming TV show, “Wicked Tuna”.

One newsviner was in the Discovery series Lobster Wars. F/V Excalibur, and Capt. Dave is now the second!

Wicked Tuna, meanwhile, hails from Piligian’s Pilgrim Studios (Dirty Jobs)and will explore the business of bluefin tuna fishing in Gloucester, Mass., as crews set sail for the elusive fish that can fetch between $3,000 and $15,000 in peak season.

“Commercial tuna fishing is brutally competitive. With its limited season, the intelligence and prowess of the fish, and the sheer fact that they’re worth so much, the livelihood of each vessel’s crew can be made or broken in a month,” Piligian said. “Pairing that kind of pressure with the harsh environment of Gloucester makes this one of the most intense and compelling series Pilgrim has ever produced.”

The series is attracting plenty of attention and there already have been articles written about the show and featured in numerous sport-fishing blogs and in a couple of Huffington Post articles.

Carl Safina, not your ordinary fellow but is a MacArthur fellow, Pew fellow, and Guggenheim fellow, had a very predictable reaction, being anti-fish, and staying loyal to the Pew philosophy. I don’t know much about Mr. Safina, but Pew Fellow says plenty to me.

National Geographic Channel, In Race for Bottom, Adds Killing Endangered Species to New Season Entertainment Lineup

Well, people, what an incredibly long drop it’s been since the electrifying National Geographic TV specials of my youth, whose mere opening theme notes would raise the hair on my neck.

Oh oh.

It seems almost like the scenario of a post-apocalyptic surrealist satire, unimaginable just a few years back: National Geographic Channel has been bought out by Fox, is “joint-venturing” with the disgraceful and disgraced Rupert Murdoch, and creating programming to push Bill O’Reilly’s books. And, well — National Geographic Channel will be killing endangered species for entertainment.

Anyone that’s read my Fox articles know that this fellow and I do have some common ground, and I think O’reilly is a nut, but much to the chagrin of Safina, Blue fin are not an endangered specie.

They’ve just announced the new unscripted show: Wicked Tuna.

Oh. My Gawd!

Awesome, eh? Already, we have: a smiling face and a dead, rather small, bluefin tuna.

Here, in 2012, I find the premise revolting. Despicable.

Get a grip, Carl.

And therefore, it’s bound to be a crowd pleaser as National Geographic Channel aims to lead in Cable’s race to the bottom.

Every ones a critic!

The thrilling tagging of giant fish as scientists track their migrations across oceans might have provided the show’s rationale, but that’s clearly too intellectual (though all the other elements of cable success are there: adventure, personal drama (the tagging involves grad students), seasickness, profanity). Read the rest here!

I wish it was video instead of print. Visions of bulging eyes an pulsating veins!

He does semi-snap out of it in his next article at Huffpost, leaving plenty of controversial remarks that I personally found quite offensive, and un truthful, but that is to be expected from a Pew crusader. I digress.

Will National Geographic TV’s Wicked Tuna Be Better Than Advertised?

Following National Geographic Channel’s announcement of its upcoming TV show, “Wicked Tuna,” and my consequent slam, I received a phone call inviting me to Nat Geo headquarters. Our discussion seemed a big improvement over their press release. Yes, really. As announced, this show will feature commercial fishing for bluefin tuna. With or without the cameras, those boats kill fish,,global bluefin tuna enterprise,,in the world,,problem arises,,global union of conservation scientists,,perfectly legal,,enormous nets,,Atlantic,, Mediterranean,,people use rods-and-reels,,killing relatively few fish,, but let’s move on.

Whew!

What I heard was: National Geographic is committed to the big picture. Conservation concerns will be part of the project. That’s their promise so let’s take them at their word. But can they weave it all it into a compelling show that will make viewers take their fingers off their remotes? That’s a taller order. The website they’re building for the series may turn out to be the better vehicle for the deeper story, and a wide range of opinion — which there will be.

So we’ll see. But after getting such a bad sense from their initial announcement, it was good to have my expectations raised.

Carl Safina has maintained my expectations of a Pew soldier fellow. Fanaticism.

Another critic, Virginia Willis, author of Bon Appetit,Y’all!, a third generation Southern cook ala Paula Dean style is absolutely outraged! Wicked Tuna: A Deal with the Devil. She feels “betrayed, heartbroken, and sick.”

From her blog, we get a sense a beginning and end of a wonderful relationship and her generational heritage with National Geographic which, until now, was a part of that.

 There were two magazines we weren’t allowed to play with when I was growing up: Southern Living and National Geographic. They were the “important” magazines. They were special. Now, an adult and a chef, I know Southern Living undoubtedly helped fuel my love of food and cooking. But, the magazine that has always been closest to my heart is National Geographic.

Southern Living and cooking also led Paula Dean into cooking some pretty tastey, but very unhealthy chow! And Diabetes.

She describes her youthful recollections and cherished memory’s of the publication, and shares some childhood history.

My grandparents loved to travel in their motor home. Often, my sister and I or a cousin would travel with them. We’d go away for weeks and months at a time every summer. My older cousin Sam went with them to Alaska, a trip I still yearn to take. The next year, they took me to Newfoundland. While on the ferry off the Nova Scotia coast I witnessed a pod of whales rolling in the deep blue water. Later, my sister and I traveled from Georgia clear across the Southwest then north up into the Canadian territory of Saskatchewan before we headed back across the entire United States to Georgia. A stack of National Geographic magazines with the familiar yellow spine and the appropriate maps for our travels, accompanied every trip. In high school, I remember having the National Geographic map of Europe tacked up on my wall; it seemed a million miles away from my red dirt road in South Georgia, but I knew I wanted to go there, and eventually, I did.

NatGeo gets dumped into the outhouse from there.

It’s an absolute disgrace. It’s wicked in the true sense of the word, evil and morally wrong.

National Geographic is capitalizing on and exploiting the very species they have declared to be on the verge of extinction.

The Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch states consumers should “Avoid” all bluefin tuna, referencing the near collapse of bluefin populations worldwide.

Last year, the Center for Biological Diversity submitted a petition to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration seeking an endangered status for the fish, claiming the species faces possible extinction because of overfishing and habitat degradation.

Ocean Conservancy states the species is overfished.

The Pew Charitable Trust states, “Some species of tuna, such as the valuable Atlantic bluefin tuna, are dangerously over-exploited.”

Pew’s Global Tuna Conservation Campaign is urging countries fishing for tuna to “enact strong measures that will lead to the recovery of severely depleted Atlantic bluefin tuna population, including suspension of the fishery and prohibit take of Atlantic bluefin tuna on its only known spawning grounds.” The list of organizations against bluefin fishing goes on and on and on.

As a chef and food writer, I care about the food I prepare, the food I eat. I work to educate my students and readers about responsible and sustainable food. As the National Geographic Society mission states, I work to inspire people to care about the planet.

John Fahey, Chairman & CEO of the National Geographic Society should hang his head in shame.

Well, Hush my puppies! Ah do declare! Virginia (i love that name) could be a writer for the Society of Environmental Journalists (SEJ)

UPDATE: 1/24/12 MANY OF THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE FROM HARD-WORKING FISHERMEN WITH FAMILIES TO SUPPORT. VERY CLEARLY, WE DISAGREE ON CERTAIN POINTS. THE DIALOGUE HAS BECOME QUITE HEATED. WHILE I DO NOT APPRECIATE NAME-CALLING AND PERSONAL SLURS, I DO APPRECIATE THE PASSION AND EXPERIENCE THAT THEY BRING TO THE CONVERSATION.THANK YOU FOR READING.

I give her a lot of credit, ton’s, for her dialogue with fishermen at her blog, and there is a lot of information in her comment section that should enlighten readers about the fishery. The U S fishery, that always gets buried under “world” fishery issues. U S Fishermen are always over shadowed. Purposefully.

Between Carl, and Virginia, the oil money created Pew Charities agenda is clearly stated with many Pew recipients mentioned.

I enjoyed Virginia Willis’s recollections of traveling cross country in Gramp and Grans motor home, something Daves kids don’t have the luxury of, and viewers will get the chance to meet his kids. They are a working class family, trying to get through.

Captain Dave was active in the comment sections of these articles, and there is a difference between emotional anti fish comments and informed pro fish comments. Should you read them, you can decide for yourself how you feel about them, and the issues.

Talking to Dave, I get a sense we will all learn from this series, which will make it worth watching.

Carl Safina will learn that US Fishermen are more concerned about the tuna than he gives them credit for.

After all, if the fish were gone, the fishermen also would be gone. They want to fish forever.

Don’t worry about Carl. As long as Pew has oil money to toss at Pew Fellows, his existence is assured.

Link

————————————————————————————————————————

Waking up with Wicked Tuna on the Morning Buzz, WHEB the Rock station

Captain Dave Marciano, and mate, nephew Jay  Muenzner are in the studio of The Rock station WHEB  yucking it with Greg and the Morning Buzz crew.

I’m sitting here this morning trying not to wicked pissah my pants! These frigging guy’s are off the grid, Man!

“There’s no guarantee’s out they-ah” And so it begins! Click here to listen

Greg Kretschmar is a fisherman groupie. He loves them all!

He’s a big Deadliest Catch fan doing shows with them on air, and on the arena circuit.

Kretschmar just played the Barry Manilow  song Copa Cabana with some very creative lyrics about Dave, Jay and Hard Merch. I’m sure when you hear it, life will never be the same! Click here for the song

I’m typing this as I listen, and Paul Hebert just joined them by telephone. These guy’s are hilarious! Click here to listen

They were cutting it up pretty good, but there were also some serious moment’s in the un scripted round table conversation.

One thing is clear. Fame has not changed these guy’s.

When Paul describes the opportunity’s the show has delivered to them, and he highlight’s the charitable event’s, that’s a damned good indicator that they are the real deal.

It has brought opportunity to Jay. A quote from the show, “He’s getting more ass than a toilet seat”.

The chicks are crawling all over the wharf’s of Gloucester looking for him!

This Wicked Tuna crew is by far my favorite but you gotta like Paul and his crew. They were late to the show last filming season, but they are just getting ready to start filming season three, and I’ll bet we’ll see a lot more of them. I can’t wait!

I’ve met Dave in person, and  thing’s looked very bleak for this commercial fisherman, but wow, have thing’s turned around for him, and honestly, it could not have happened to a nicer guy. What you see I what you get.

In another conversation last year, he was telling me a story about a limo driver that cracked me up.

He was going to some promotional event, somewhere, and the limo pulled up to the door. He, of course, gets out like real people would, walks to the back and pulls his bag out of the trunk, prompting the driver to say, “um, you’re making me look bad.”

Dave, “well, wadda ya mean?!!”

The driver say’s looking around at the other limo drivers, and he say’s, “You’re not letting me do my job.”

The story came to mind this morning when they were talking about Dave’s “people”. Agents and planners.

Myself, I see someone who has become an ambassador for the fishermen that they so badly needed, and this too, was not planned. It just happened because of Dave’s personality, and this show, and the fan’s that follow these guy’s.

Public knowledge about US Fishery’s is sadly almost non existent, and the Wicked Tuna fans have increased awareness in discussions with friends and other fan’s.

Prior to season one, we talked on the phone, and he said he would be mentioning the regulatory short falls that affect fishermen, and he has done that. He has also shown that this fishery is a responsible fishery. By law, every US fishery is.

The show was also receiving push back by members of the environmental crowd that see fishing as something that should be eliminated, using dire predictions about the tuna stock’s that was alarmist, and not quite in tune with today’s outlook of the tuna stocks, the star’s on the show.

Back then, no one ever dreamed that this phenomenon of a show would even exist, and there would be no way to believe if it did, the show would be so successful. The reason for success is the people on the show.

Comment here

—————————————————————————————————————————————————–

On May 1st, the allocation for cod will be cut by as much as 78% , and drastic cuts to yellow tail flounder and other species, will all but finish off New England’s storied fishing fleet, and jeopardize the nation’s most lucrative fishery, the scallop industry.

Following these articles and reading endless proclamation’s of politicians stating their outrage, and pledging help, along with economic relief, just as was heard today from Senator Warren at the Boston Fish Rally today in the Eleventh Hour, one realizes the perverse “system” is more than broken.

It is a system of failure on a number of front’s ranging from the ineptness of multi species fishery regulators that are lawyers and accountants, mixed in with environmentalist’s that would capitalize on climate change with the exception of this issue of course, and blindly ignore it, when in reality, that is what has changed a fishery that was until two years ago, on target to be rebuilt by 2014.

As we are subjected to the opinions of expert’s in the science end, the faction everyone wants fishery management based upon, say they aren’t sure why there are such a low recruitment of stock’s, I can’t help but to listen to NEFMC council member David Goethal bring up the fact that the fish have reacted to the warming waters off our coast, in an excellent presentation at last week’s council meeting, and think about the scuba diver that found a Blue Crab in Gloucester Harbor last summer.

There is also the lack of crab this spring in the Chesapeake. Are they too marching northward?

I also cannot ignore the anecdotal evidence of an old Newfie fisherman say he has never seen so many ground fish in fifty years of being on the water!

Interesting enough, Newfoundland no longer has the infrastructure, manpower, or markets to take advantage of the situation, and as on the Cape, the fish will surely be taken care of by the 9 million harp seals they have no market for, and are under assault by the EU anti seal product people who have no common sense, or awareness of the predator/prey model of life.

The seals consume 12 to 14 Million tonnes of marketable fish which is 50 times the commercial fish harvest.

Eco based fishery management can’t come soon enough!

The environmentalists like the idea. I wonder if they realize what eco based management exactly means!

I read this today.

If I didn’t know any better, and I don’t, this sounds like the words of Regional Administrator John Bullard.

My question is, and I hope I’m not alone is, what are you clown’s talking about?

Truth is, the cod are not in free fall, but they are on the move, and just because they have moved, in what fantasy fairytale are you living in thinking fish that are not here will rebuild here?

Jeff Young, that is about the stupidest statement I’ve ever read on this subject.

John Bullard, it’s painful knowing with your lack of depth, along with your inability to think for yourself, that you are the ENGO/EDF Regional Administrator that makes Pat Kurkul look like she was competent.

And the politicians just keep saying what we want to hear, duping us into believing they can do something for fishermen, while they beat the Obama drum for Cape Wind.

I am disgusted.

 “A real inconvenient truth”

Your snide and disingenuous remarks about US fishermen thinking the US taxpayer covering the bill for observer coverage is a nice ploy Mr. Shelly. You guys are so slick at pitting the general public against your favorite fund raising target.(commercial fishermen)

 

Why don’t you explain to your kool aid drinking followers how the federal Gov/NOAA/NMFS/ or whatever they call themselves today have been stealing the import duties on foreign seafood from the Saltonstall Kennedy act that are supposed to go to the industry to support and pay for things such as observers. Talk about an inconvenient truth. Or perhaps how yours and the host of other ENGO’s are funded by big oil and their minions who are looking to rid themselves of those pesky little food producers who happen to be in the way of their and your plans of ocean conquest and industrialization! Another inconvenient truth. Or how those import tariffs on foreign seafood  have been stolen for years used to bolster the budget of the over regulating bureaucracy known as the Dept. of Commerce, who runs NOAA and the National Marine Fisheries Diservice. How many tens or hundreds of millions of dollars has this added up to over the years? This would be a great project for your outcome based numbers crunchers. Or how we as a nation are now importing 93% of the seafood consumed by our citizenry. God forbid we reduce our dependence on foreign fish! Fish that by the way come from nations that practice little or no conservation measures at all. My God man, do you realize what the consequences to the amount of foreign fish import duty dollars that are being stolen would be?

Christ if you let those American fishermen go to work and earn a living catching American fish and selling them to the American consumer, the stolen seafood import duty funds would perish, and the need for fishermen to get any government money woild go away! God forbid!

————————————————————————————————–

Letter to the editor of Fishery Nation,

Fishermen In Alaska Should Be Nervous As A Dartmouth College Girl About Community Fishing Associations Acting Like The New Nice Guy In Town

Yes the new nice guy in town is the Community Fishing Association. Forget about past transgressions and the screwing those other unfortunates have gotten at the hands of this monster he has been re-branded with a squeeky clean image and an attitude that says, “I am just here to help you and pay attention to your needs.” So right about now there is a lot of free drinks, some light touching and joking around, and plenty of attention. Sadly many of us already know how this ends, but that’s okay because statistically 95% will not speak up, and of the 5% who do, only a pathetic 2% will be believed. So when you wake up crying don’t immediately blame yourselves as so many are inclined to do. Because this guy knows exactly how to take it all from you, there is a virtual playbook written by those who have done it before.

To put it bluntly, the majority of you are about to be raped. The lawyers, liars, and lobbyists headed your way are going to take you for everything you’ve got and if you’re lucky, lease it back to you for an exhorbitant price. If what happened in New England is any indication it is likely to be a screwing of biblical proportions that no amount of letters to Penthouse will ever do justice. Those of you that complain will get it the worst, and the ones who cooperate will become finger puppets used as weapons against your fellow fishermen in order to get more of what is theirs. The money shot is a large donation from the PEW Charitable Trusts financing anti-fishing campaigns that turn you against each other. Once that gets in your hair it isn’t easy to wash out.

So please be warned and take the time to really look at the Community Fishing Associations that are being presented as role models. Look past the carefully created image they have spent a fortune to fabricate. When those nice folks got extra quota awarded to them it came from the shattered hopes and dreams of so many others. When they mount media campaigns bashing other fishermen, people get hurt, and it still goes on today. One only need listen to those who represent CFA’s at fishing council hammering away on fishermen who have done nothing but try to make a living. There is no such thing as extra, when you take from others it may make you a success but it surely doesn’t make you a nice guy. There is a very good reason these folks want CFA’s in place before any more quota systems are developed. They want to be there when the wealth of ALaska’s future is divided to ensure they get a chance to take as much as possible and a legal way to buy up the rest, preventing industry consolidation by gathering it into their own hands.

Fishermen have always been an honest, (Barring fishing stories of course) and hard working group. So when all they have worked for is taken from them, the majority won’t shed any tears, but even the toughest of men, and the hardest of hearts are softened by the tears of hungry children whose hopes and prospects have been taken as well. Or even the tears of a cherished daughter who can no longer afford a good education at a safe college and is forced to go to a “Rapey” one instead.

Barnacle Bill

Comment here

————————————————–

I got many endorsements of my recent letter on Kodiak’s besotted advisor selection and the demise of the King Crab Capital of the World. Emails rolled in and the phone rang constantly. The letter made a national website for, as one commenter noted, “sleeping with the enemy.”The Board of Fisheries recently approved my proposal to wisely shut down hard on bottom trawling in all state waters around Kodiak.It is clearly time for the borough and city managers to get behind funding a solution to getting back our crab Capital crown.

A few years ago, local officials abetted a line item of $28 million for a new Alaska Department of Fish and Game building. I’d like elected officials to ask for $2 million to undo some of the trawler damages to crab stocks; plus another $20 million for the restoration program to seriously rebuild crab fisheries.

Can you legitimately tell us that it is cheaper to build bureaucracies and

obligate the state to pensions and benefits than to start thinking in terms of greater annual tax revenues from fishing businesses?

Lu Dochtermann, FV North Point

Read more: Kodiak Daily Mirror – Line item needed to restore crab

————————————————————-

The city of Kodiak and the borough just approved the ultimate insider – one who has long represented such huge trawl interests as the at-sea factory trawlers, who do nothing for our local economy – to be the new fisheries adviser.  One wonders why Heather McCarty would even take a mere $30,000 position in a community far from where she lives.

Further, how can the wife of a major federal fishery council voting member — Dr. James Balsiger, Alaska regional administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service — not be compromised while aboard at Kodiak?

Sure she is talented, likeable and qualified.  Making a living off our federal fisheries has been her major lobbyist income for well over a decade. But that’s no excuse for letting Kodiak’s guard down.

Mel Stephens was right when he expressed serious concerns about the selection process.  Louise Stutes was right when she questioned whether McCarty will be likely to represent all fishing sectors in Kodiak, because she is employed as a lobbyist for Pacific Seafoods Inc., employment she’ll drop if chosen.

Stepping down is not sufficient.  Council expertise alone is not sufficient.  Qualifications start with a long-term look at one’s integrity and overall ethics, in the light of money made and former clients served well.

I get along with Heather, too.  But I and other longliners do not want her to represent our concerns, specifically because they run counter to the large processors and bottom trawlers who cared not for our crab and halibut.

In 2013, the midwater and bottom trawl fleet in the Bering Sea took over 7 million pounds of our halibut as bycatch dumped overboard as ‘deadloss.’

Ten years ago, the halibut fixed gear fleet quota for area 4 — Unimak Pass to Attu and the entire Bering Sea — was 15.4 million pounds.  However, the trawl fleet had a halibut bycatch deadloss of 7 million pounds. Yet, in 2014, area 4 halibut quota is only 3.4 million pounds.

We now get one-fifth as much to supply USA consumers, while the trawlers keep killing twice that much, year in and year out.

Kodiak was once the King Crab Capital of the World. Congratulations to our elected officials for making us the Hard on Bottom Trawl Capital of the World. The next joint budget item ought to be a new sign at the airport, so all of America will celebrate what you have done.

Lu Dochtermann, F/V North Point

Leave comments here

—————————————————————————————————

Submitted to City Council today, prior to their attempting to quickly remove two more vital properties from the Designated Port Area:

To whom it may concern,

                I believe it was almost two years ago when I first became aware there was corruption at work in Gloucester. At that time, I wrote a letter to the editor of the Gloucester Daily Times, “Wake up, Gloucester”, because it was clear to me the City had “made a deal” with developers against the will of the people.  At the time, I thought it was just an effort to land grab, which is part of the plan, but I have since learned, for certain, there is a far greater Evil operating here.

                State and City government, coordinated with media, developers and bureaucrats are being used to systematically destroy the fishing industry, working waterfront, ecosystems and community of Gloucester, Massachusetts, in support of corporate privatization and sale of our Ocean. The original, afore-mentioned, proposed development is designed to destroy everything around it, proven scientifically with the “Godfrey Report”, and still to this day, no governmental agency has intervened to stop it. This further demonstrates government involvement in this corruption. There may be some of you who are being manipulated to believe you are helping the economy of Gloucester, which is part of the reason I write this letter, to allow a final opportunity to remove yourselves from the corruption, for YOUR own good.

                I request a full investigation, on every level, on behalf of the safety and well-being of the citizens of Gloucester, their homes and businesses.  I also request you cease all actions related to destruction of the working waterfront and gentrification of Gloucester until these investigations are complete. Myself, and my associates would be happy to provide the volumes of evidence and testimony we’ve gathered to investigators. For any Federal, State or City official to read this and not take action to prevent this corruption, holds you, morally, and your office financially responsible for the damages that appear destined for what was once, and should remain the proudest fishing port, and community in the world.
Thank you for your wise consideration, James A. Tarantino 26 Fort Square Gloucester, MA 01930